Results 211 to 224 of 224
-
09-20-2012, 07:50 AM #211
Thank you Ben. I went to your site and your designs are great....and I agree, having better line control would make the great fundamentals of your designs "pop" in drawing form. I know when the home is done it hardly matters, but I think presenting drawings a certain way is so important.
Your designs/drawings are really good, I am impressed.X5
i7-3930k Dell XPS - 16GB Ram
(2) 30" Dell 3008WFP Monitors
Wacom 24HD
-
09-20-2012, 08:20 AM #212
-
09-20-2012, 10:53 AM #213Just Some Guy
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
- Posts
- 717
-
09-21-2012, 08:44 PM #214
Looks like this thread is nearly dead, but I think it served its purpose. Chief Architect is awesome! but, we would like to see:
1. Better line control - primarily line weights.
2. Better interface - more modern and better thought to the tools.
3. Better 2D tools in general. This would include what 2D tools can do like map images.
...and if CA wants to come up with a better naming scheme that would be cool, but not high on the needed list. I think that would be better for CA as a company and make architects feel better their software is not just a light upgrade to what their own clients buy at costco. It just happened the other day, a local builder asked me what I used and I didn't mention CA. If the naming thing can change I think many of us will come out of the closet.X5
i7-3930k Dell XPS - 16GB Ram
(2) 30" Dell 3008WFP Monitors
Wacom 24HD
-
09-21-2012, 11:24 PM #215Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Bay Area, California
- Posts
- 1,334
Johnny,
Im still hoping youll show that custom home you had on here earlier but as a vectorview like you posted on your very first elevations. Im interested to see how vectorworks handles a large custom very detailed home.Chad Cardin
MEMBER SINCE V9... NOW X5
-
09-22-2012, 09:22 AM #216Grumpy Old User
- Join Date
- Aug 1999
- Location
- Seattle 98199
- Posts
- 1,180
Ron Ravenscroft
RAVENSCROFT ARCHITECTS, LTD.
20611 N. 17th WAy
Phoenix, Arizona 85024
623-434-0092 - 480-797-6894
rrarchpa@cox.net or ron@raltd.net
Version4 to X5 and beyond
-
09-22-2012, 09:33 AM #217Grumpy Old User
- Join Date
- Aug 1999
- Location
- Seattle 98199
- Posts
- 1,180
I think that Chief coming from an orgin of "House Building" makes it difficult for them to see what you and others have been talking about. As Architects we want to show a design concept of a project as Johnny as shown us. Vectorworks and other programs come from the design side of things. I not sure the present Chief code will allow that, in many ways we are talking about apples and oranges. I fnd myself printing an elevation line drawing, applying makkers then scanning it for a presentation. I have tried the watercoler template but find it limiting.
Chief is still the fastest way to draw a plan, add a roof, and do elevations. I'd love to see the next step in the near future.
Thank you all for a great discussion. We need more like this.
Ron Ravenscroft
RAVENSCROFT ARCHITECTS, LTD.
20611 N. 17th WAy
Phoenix, Arizona 85024
623-434-0092 - 480-797-6894
rrarchpa@cox.net or ron@raltd.net
Version4 to X5 and beyond
-
09-22-2012, 09:55 AM #218
-
09-22-2012, 04:44 PM #219Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Bay Area, California
- Posts
- 1,334
Johnny,
Oh ok, I didnt want you to go out of your way to make something just to post. I was just curious to see how that larger more detailed home would look like in the elevation format you had the other ones in. No biggie, either way they all look great!Chad Cardin
MEMBER SINCE V9... NOW X5
-
09-22-2012, 08:21 PM #220Just Some Guy
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
- Posts
- 717
I believe you are correct. But I think we may be dealing with a change in technology\culture\something.
Think back to the time when scribes labored over desks, copying books by hand, doing beautiful illuminated letters. Now we have printing presses, publication for the masses at low cost, publications scanned into computers and delivered via the internet to e-book readers. Cost, not beauty, drives the mass market.
Blue prints were once blue, then one day along came Xerox and things changed.
Folks used to talk on phones, now it seems, sometimes, that texting is taking over.
The artistic element of this business may be facing a similar change with the advent of fast computers, ink jet printers and software like CA.
I don't think most builders care if someone labored with love and care over a beautiful set of plans - they have work to do and as long as the plans allow that, they are good to go.
Someone, who's name escapes me, said something to the effect that things need to be adequate to the task at hand and no more.
When it comes to providing visuals that allow the customer to understand what is to be built and documents for the builder that allow him to do his job, CA is more then adequate.
In very broad terms the question becomes, does the world, at this point, need anything more, to do what needs to be done?Regards, Frederick C. Wilt (Began with v9, now using X6 aka v16)
-
09-23-2012, 07:09 AM #221
Taking the drawing appearance out of the argument, its my assertion (along with most architects) the process and attention to these details will result in better design/architecture. Allowing yourself to be engulfed with how everything looks speaks to the kind of work someone does - inevitably resulting in better everything. Call it: honing a meticulous nature. Better drawings also convey better instruction, and could very well lead to the builder grasping something better than he otherwise would.
Also, we are just asking for the tools to make the choice. Programs like Vectorworks, Revit, and others do this - why can't CA. How difficult is it to include better 2d tools? CA does the more difficult things well, I think they can spend a little time on improving things architects would like to see in this program. The comments on this thread show designers/architects would like to see CA improve their 2D tools.X5
i7-3930k Dell XPS - 16GB Ram
(2) 30" Dell 3008WFP Monitors
Wacom 24HD
-
09-23-2012, 09:54 AM #222Just Some Guy
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Smith Mountain Lake, Virginia
- Posts
- 717
I understand that you believe this to be true - and you may well be right - however, based on my experience, I do not believe it to be true to a meaningful degree.
That said, I am ALL in favor of anything that will attract more customers to CA - so if better 2D tools will do that, let's add 'em - the sooner the better!Regards, Frederick C. Wilt (Began with v9, now using X6 aka v16)
-
09-24-2012, 08:17 AM #223Administrator
- Join Date
- Jan 2000
- Posts
- 4,161
Two observations that I'm taking away from this thread.
1) The ability to specify a different end cap style for certain lines.
2) The ability to create profile lines that show at a different weight.
A comment on 1). In general it is very difficult to get lines to look right when they join at odd angles using a square end cap. That is why rounded ends are used. For 90 degree corners they look good, everything else becomes a problem. We could easily switch to a different end cap style but we can't use that in all cases or the drawings will really look bad.
Pen plotters produce rounded end caps just because that is the way they worked. To a large degree CAD has been influenced by pen plotters.
It is probably time for us to think about places where we can use different end cap styles to improve the drawing precision.Doug Park
Principal Software Architect
Chief Architect, Inc.
-
09-24-2012, 09:21 AM #224
Thanks Doug for taking the time to read this. I think your observations are a great start. The only thing I would add is to look at some 2D tools that might help product quick little drawings without the need for 3D model creation.
That might not be Chief's focus, but currently I feel I need 2 CAD systems, since CA does 3D so well, but VectorWorks does 2D so well.
...but yes, profiles and how lines are finished would help a lot.X5
i7-3930k Dell XPS - 16GB Ram
(2) 30" Dell 3008WFP Monitors
Wacom 24HD