The dsh Terrain Building Test

[dshall]

Scott

My focus was on yours and Lews discussion of determining the pad elevation , which I think is consistent within a couple of inches accuracy and makes sense. I don't think the pad elevation is iff 6" per my correction.

As to the contours, it looks like two different people programed that and they weren't talking to each other because apparently different criteria was used as a starting reference point. Chief could easily figure out this discrepancy if they wanted. The inconsistency is obvious.

Another example of a excellent feature which no one looks at because its confusing and too limited.

Who cares about Lew's and my discussion. I feel in this particular situation Lew does not know what he is talking about (let's cut to the chase).

I do not want to get off track so I go back to post #1. Nobody has taken the challenge, and maybe you are correct, the programmer's at CA were not communicating, I don't care, I just want CA to acknowledge the issue.

Instead, Doug responds in a different thread, and he refers to the absolute elevations and the relative to floor elevations. But no examples, pie in the sky stuff that no one understands. He has not responded to my quest to determine "the average elevation" for my sample plan, is it that difficult to figure "average elevation" from the plan I provided? Or maybe this average elevation stuff is nonsense.

It's just very frustrating trying to share ideas with people and we can't get in sync to come to a consensus, probably my problem.