Results 31 to 45 of 95
Thread: Design vs. engineering question
-
04-02-2011, 07:18 PM #31
never had that problem and I never want an engineer on the job site.
I also work in the safest area of the country for earthquakes.Last edited by Thane Pearson; 04-02-2011 at 07:20 PM.
Thane Pearson CPBD, AIBD, LEED AP
Thane Pearson Design
York, Maine 03909
207-351-2711
X3
-
04-02-2011, 07:24 PM #32
I never want an engineer on the job site
Thane:
Interesting ...
this is why Michael posted the original query
to find out how others proceed with their work flow
Bottom line it all depends
LewLew Buttery
Castle Golden Design - "We make dreams visible"
Lockport, NY
716-434-5051
www.castlegoldendesign.com
lbuttery at castlegoldendesign.com
CHIEF X5 (started with v9.5)
-
04-02-2011, 07:41 PM #33
Michael,
Well, if you're stating that an engineer is going to be involved in any case, then that is different. You seemed to imply that engineers were only brought in when the local codes required it, and that you really didn't need or want specific engineering details, which struck me as being irresponsible for a builder in your region. If I've misunderstood, then I apologize.
I usually hire (or actually let the client hire directly) structural engineers when it gets too tedious. (Mostly second-story additions and hillsides.) In earthquake country around here, the calculations are often over 50 pages, sometimes WAY over 50 pages. In these cases, the structural engineer will do his own drawings. I just don't want the liability.Richard
---------------
Richard Morrison
Architect-Interior Designer
X6 Premier, Win8 64
http://www.richardmorrison.com
-
04-02-2011, 08:40 PM #34Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Wasilla, Alaska
- Posts
- 799
Richard,
Thank you. You were partly right, just not in understanding my question. Alaska is interesting. I do work in a [B]very[B] wildly ranging place in the country as far as engineering and climate is concerned. For the most part when I work in Anchorage, engineering is a must and is the standard practice. 1 hour away where I live in Wasilla, residential engineering is almost unheard of. Since I moved here in 2004 I have never worked off of, or even seen an engineered set of residential plans. The good part is, its in a lower seismic zone, and most homes are simple enough to frame using prescriptive methods.Michael
Chief Architect X3-X6
Windows 7
I5 Quad core 8 GB
NVIDEA Ge Force GT430
-
04-02-2011, 09:47 PM #35
I find it interesting that there seems to be such concern about a client having to pay for professional structural engineering when that engineering, even here in earthquake-prone California, is such a small percentage of construction costs. In most cases, in my experience, this engineering (limited to residential work) runs something like 0.5% to, only in the most extreme circumstances maybe 2% of the total cost of construction. And that includes ALL of the structural drawings, details, and specifications done by the engineer. I just provide CAD backgrounds for floor plans, sections, and elevations.
If a client balks at this, the job isn't likely worth your time or liability whether you're a designer, builder, engineer, or architect.
I guess I'm a little baffled as to why there is such a seeming conundrum about where the designer leaves off and the engineer begins. The dividing line is pretty clear, at least as far as the lawyers are concerned. And as Richard has often pointed out, the leading source of liability claims against architects are not structural issues, but water damage.
Bryce Engstrom: Architect, LEED AP
www.engstromarchitecture.com
Chief X6 Beta
Sketchup Pro 6, Free 8, Thea Render, Lumion
Chief to Kerkythea & Thea Render Converter
-
04-02-2011, 10:04 PM #36Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Wasilla, Alaska
- Posts
- 799
Bryce,
Thank you for your response. You answered my question perfectly. It sound like you supply the layouts and elevations and you have an engineer do the rest. It seems there is no "industry standard". This is my first project where my contract included design work. In the future I'll just stipulate that I stop after all layouts and elevations are complete and the engineer can have it from there (unless of course he/she needs more info).Michael
Chief Architect X3-X6
Windows 7
I5 Quad core 8 GB
NVIDEA Ge Force GT430
-
04-03-2011, 05:32 AM #37Windows 7
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Montrose Colorado
- Posts
- 252
Ok....Yikes!
1 hour away where I live in Wasilla, residential engineering is almost unheard of. Since I moved here in 2004 I have never worked off of, or even seen an engineered set of residential plans. The good part is, its in a lower seismic zone, and most homes are simple enough to frame using prescriptive methods.ELDON
-
04-03-2011, 07:47 AM #38
I'm a structural engineer and I wear a disguise when going on a jobsite. Either Miss Piggy or the Big Bad Wolf.
I never let an architect or designer on one of my jobsites. Total ban.Gene Davis
SSA: X5 Premium, X4 Premium, X3, X2 (12.5.1.9), 10.08.b
Intel i7 quad-core 64-bit HM65 express, Windows 7, 16 GB RAM, NVidia GeForce GTX560M - 3 GB GDDRS - SDRAM
Google Sketchup 8.0
DropBox cloud storage
-
04-03-2011, 11:52 AM #39
Nothing against engineers. My degree is in architectural engineering. I've had engineers send clients into panic over nothing. And proven to be nothing by independent engineers.
Thane Pearson CPBD, AIBD, LEED AP
Thane Pearson Design
York, Maine 03909
207-351-2711
X3
-
04-03-2011, 12:59 PM #40Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Sep 1999
- Location
- Auckland New Zealand
- Posts
- 1,310
This has been an interesting discussion to read through.
With New Zealand being a reasonably high earthquake risk area (Witness Christchurch recently) engineering is part of almost every job.
I used to do a lot of detailing off engineers sketches and then get them signed off but I now think that approach blurs the lines of liability and get the engineer to design and detail all engineered components so there is no confusion.
My Client contract states that my Fees exclude any "specific engineering design".Gordon Martinsen
Auckland
New Zealand
W7 64 bit X5
i7 2600k 3.7Ghz
8 GB RAM
180Gb SSD
Nvidia GTX 560 1 Gb
-
04-03-2011, 03:52 PM #41Richard
---------------
Richard Morrison
Architect-Interior Designer
X6 Premier, Win8 64
http://www.richardmorrison.com
-
04-03-2011, 08:01 PM #42Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 35
Is that what makes those Architect fees so high?
Home Designer Pro 8
Home Designer Pro 10
Chief Architect X3 Trial
-
04-04-2011, 12:19 AM #43Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Wasilla, Alaska
- Posts
- 799
Marty,
Thank you. It sounds like you've confirmed what a couple of the other guys said.
It seems maybe the smartest thing to do is stop short of doing any engineering details at all. Don't step on anyone's toes, avoid the liability, and isn't it actually illeg..
I mean against the...
Er...frowned upon for an engineer to stamp something he/she didn't draw up?
Seriously though, all you engineers and architects out there, is my understanding correct? Are you permitted to stamp something (assuming its drawn correctly) if you didn't draw it up? Where is that line drawn legally?
I really do appreciate everyone's input on this. I know its a touchy subject and its easy to offend or be offended (especially when being corrected). I've also learned that being corrected (even when it initially feels like an offense) is one of the best ways to learn.Michael
Chief Architect X3-X6
Windows 7
I5 Quad core 8 GB
NVIDEA Ge Force GT430
-
04-04-2011, 01:54 AM #44
Are you permitted to stamp something (assuming its drawn correctly) if you didn't draw it up? Where is that line drawn legally?
Michael:
they don't have to draw it, but it does have to be drawn under their direct supervision.
scenario 1:
a drafter (employee or independent) sitting in the same office
given instructions on what to draw
hould be fine unless it could be proven that their was no
supervision
scenario 2:
a drafter (employee or independent) working at home via the internet
given instructions on what to draw
very questionable unless there is a proven record of supervision
with one engineer we worked with who was near retirement (old school)
he would create the hand drawing and then we would re-do it in chief
he would then review it and sign it
this allowed us to show the same cad detail from the various points of view
(left.ight,front,back,top,bottom)
he would do one drawing and we could have 6 drawings in the permit set
or we could do cross-sections etc
I kept the original drawing(s) and all the emails
at the end he printed and signed the final PDF's (sent vie email)
and we then added his pages to our pages (sent via courier)
as needed, we would annotate our pages giving a callout to his pages
LewLew Buttery
Castle Golden Design - "We make dreams visible"
Lockport, NY
716-434-5051
www.castlegoldendesign.com
lbuttery at castlegoldendesign.com
CHIEF X5 (started with v9.5)
-
04-04-2011, 05:49 AM #45Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Blue Ridge Mtns.
- Posts
- 4
Michael:
I appreciate your line of thinking, and questioning. As a design/ builder, I sympathize.
When you ask a question, some never miss the opportunity to pounce with overwrought rhetoric and opinion. Perhaps valuable, perhaps not so much. I chuckle when people ascribe motives to others in haste, with decided lack of knowledge of the particulars involved. What else do they make similar errors on ?
I'm writing to offer an additional perspective. Profitability.
As a builder 'just getting into design work', I'll recommend that you monitor your first few projects where you perform the design/ drafting/ drawing with Chief. Since you probably wear many 'hats' as conductor of the build process, what will be the 'sweet spot' for you working with Chief through that process ? That will be the intersection of time best spent, satisfaction/ reward, and profitability. Chief is such a powerful design and sales tool. Drafting of numerous CAD details, which an engineer may already have, may not be profitable.
Additionally, experience has shown me that the better engineers - the ones you want to work with - are creative. Creative in the sense that they realize there may be easier or simpler ways to accomplish things with materials and labor, and that you as the builder/ conductor of the process have a key role to perform in controlling those 'means and methods'. Developing trust and rapport with a creative engineer is invaluable; it will increase your satisfaction, and enhance profitability.
With custom design/ build, quite obviously each project will be different. That rapport with a good engineer will serve you well. Usually in a preliminary review, you both can chart a course for the project that increases efficiency and makes for a better workflow.
I also appreciated your question because within it, I recognized an issue that often comes up on a custom project. Generally stated, how to deploy resources to create the best design, the strongest and most durable building(s), within a budget the owner can work with. The client's trust is placed in you. They approached you as a builder of trust, not an architect or engineer. You 'drive the bus'. You are the 'conductor' of the orchestra. Bringing the project home to a succesful conclusion is on your shoulders, with all that entails. Find, and collaborate with, those design and engineering professionals that you can work with effectively, in the ways that work to the strengths of each party involved. You build a trusted 'business team' that 'goes' with you from project to project.
Rich