Results 46 to 49 of 49
Thread: Layout Standards ?
-
09-01-2013, 12:18 PM #46Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- New Zealand
- Posts
- 706
The other thing that can determine the printed output is the type of printer (or probably print resolution). If I print on a bublejet the lines are thicker than if i print on My Xerox photocopier.
Graeme Taylor
currently loaded X3.1 & X4.2-64 bit & X5 64 bit
also used v7 to x12
AMD Phenom 2 black 980 3.7 GHz quad core
8GB DDR3-1333 RAM
NVIDIA GEForce GTX560 1024Mb graphics
win 7 -64 bit
2 x 24 inch monitors
-
09-02-2013, 08:16 AM #47
No, the A1.0, A1.1, A1.2 / S1.0, S1.1 etc. is just standard text on the layout, this way it's very easy to add and delete pages but the index must be changes. Hope they fix all that. Using this method, when you add a page it becomes A1.3 and A1.4 also easy to change the index without re-numbering, you are just adding and deleting pages.
Perry
P.H. DESIGNS L.L.C.
Eastvale Calif.
Alienware, liquid cooled
Ver 10-"X6 x64 SSA
WIN 8.1 PRO 64 bit
Nvidia GTX780 3GB.
i7 920 2.67-- 12 GB Ram
40" led monitor
-
09-02-2013, 08:26 AM #48
A Sheet Schedule/Index (requires some new Ruby Attributes with Sheet Label & Sheet Name) would solve this problem.
Sheet Label - G-1,G-2,G-3..., A-1,A-2,A-3,A-4...., S-1,S-2,S-3,... etc.
Sheet Name - COVER SHEET, GENERAL NOTES, ...................
Sheet Schedule - reads the current list of Sheets (Sheet Label & Sheet Name) to fill in the Schedule/Index.
I hope CA is Lurking on this oneJoseph P. Carrick, Architect - AIA
ASUS M51AC Desktop, core i7-4770 CPU @3.4 GHZ, 16 GB Ram, NVidea GT640 with60M with 3GB GM, 30" HiRes (2560/1600) Monitor , (2) 24" ASUS Monitors
Windows 8.1
Chief Architect 9, 10, X1, X3, X4 Premium, X5 Premium, X6 Premium
-
09-02-2013, 11:26 AM #49Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 361
Yeah, decimal sheet naming has been pretty standard for decades.
I just hark back to the bad old days when everything had attributes, that could be defined at the point\time of insertion, then extracted to a spreadsheet or a database, that could be linked, live to the drawing, either in plan or in layout.
And I could have graphics that displayed on screen but didn't print.
Anyway, I'm trying assiduously to avoid the 2d CAD debate, so I'm happy to just stick to schedules, macros, text editing, labels\callouts, tables and the like.Matt Kennedy
Win7, v2 beta thru x6