Appeal for API/SDK Support in Chief

[Joe Carrick]

Doug,

I for one will be chomping at the bit. It really would be great to have the ability to enhance Chief.
Are you going to be in Vegas for IBS? If so I will look forward to meeting you - maybe at the breakfast on Tuesday.

[dshall]

Doug,

I for one will be chomping at the bit. It really would be great to have the ability to enhance Chief.
Are you going to be in Vegas for IBS? If so I will look forward to meeting you - maybe at the breakfast on Tuesday.

Doug, please avoid Joe Carrick at all costs, the only reason I hang out with him is because he is my only friend.

[Joe Carrick]

Doug, please avoid Joe Carrick at all costs, the only reason I hang out with him is because he is my only friend.

Careful, you won't have any friends if you keep this up

[gteacher]

Doug:

The only foolproof method of a SDK is to design all OOP modules and hook to them. That’s basically a complete re-write. Something Chief said they WILL NOT do. I agree that would be impractical. You have proposed a reasoned approach which tell’s me that Chief DOES get it.

That’s what this thread is all about or, at least, how it started out. My effort was to show support to continue this direction in a sensible manner. Understand that a lot of the miscommunication could have been avoided with more frequent and clear updates from Chief. I think Chief’s newsletters should be more accommodating on program updates?

Trusting, the good Employees of Chief will work this out in due time. Hope we got our message across. If yous guys do as good a job on the SDK as the graphic engine, only good things will happen. GO CHIEF.

[Doug Park]

I'm not going to IBS this year.