CA for future home builder/owner

[keithhe]

I'm thinking I'm sorry I brought this thread out of retirement.

The OP said the following in post #1: "I know it depends on the state...but we will be building in the country (outside of any cities) will i have to have an engineer and achitect look over all prints? If so do you think it will be a problem finding someone to approve the entire design from a finished aspect? Or would i need to involve that person during the ground up phases?"

My opinion, AND only my opinion, is that given the criteria he put out there that some on here were simply trying to get him to run the other way. Given his multi year plan to work the design, layouts, and then consult engineer AND architect, I see nothing wrong with the idea. If it's crap, the EOR AND/OR engineer would correct it, but would have a very good strating point from where to proceed. You know, versus designing from the faucet up, which is admittedly harder and undoubtly more expensive.

It may never be up to some on this forums high standards, but if it works for the OP, then it works for the OP. Why discourage the attempt? Give advice, like, "do what you can , then have an engineer minimally and perhaps an architect work it over". Then leave it at that.

Somtimes it just gets too nasty here, on what should simply be a support forum. If you have an answer on a thread, and choose to share it, terrific, if not, move to the next thread. If your answer is condescending and negative, move on to the next thread.

Richard, with all due respect, you started your comment with this: "Johnnyprc, I have now given up getting sucked into these discussions." Then you got sucked in.

This is not an architect versus designer, versus contractor versus engineer forum. I know many, many fine examples of each, and have a lot of regard and respect for each.