Results 46 to 60 of 224
Hybrid View
-
09-13-2012, 03:06 PM #1Humble Chief User/Abuser
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Vista, CA
- Posts
- 3,264
The purpose of Government is to control the common resources, not the common man.
Larry Hawes
Hawes Home Design
Vista, CA
Hawes Home Design
X5 and X6 Public Beta 3
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Motherboard EVGA Classified SR-2
Processors (2) 6 core Xeon L5640
Memory 24GB PNY DDR3 1600
Video EVGA GTX 780
Monitor 26" LG 1920 x 1200
21" Viewsonic
-
09-13-2012, 03:10 PM #2
It's a GPU function, but I have one of the best you can get.
Perry
P.H. DESIGNS L.L.C.
Eastvale Calif.
Alienware, liquid cooled
Ver 10-"X6 x64 SSA
WIN 8.1 PRO 64 bit
Nvidia GTX780 3GB.
i7 920 2.67-- 12 GB Ram
40" led monitor
-
09-13-2012, 03:14 PM #3
I think it's both - maybe more CPU than GPU. Actually, the more I think about it the more I think it's CPU. It's almost like a Ray Trace but directly over the GPU Image. It has to be regenerated if you change the view-point.
Last edited by Joe Carrick; 09-13-2012 at 03:16 PM.
Joseph P. Carrick, Architect - AIA
ASUS M51AC Desktop, core i7-4770 CPU @3.4 GHZ, 16 GB Ram, NVidea GT640 with60M with 3GB GM, 30" HiRes (2560/1600) Monitor , (2) 24" ASUS Monitors
Windows 8.1
Chief Architect 9, 10, X1, X3, X4 Premium, X5 Premium, X6 Premium
-
09-13-2012, 03:15 PM #4
I guess that is the point really. CA is not setup well to do CONCEPT WORK in 2D. These drawings were created just in 2d - and yes, in minutes - each elevation less than 30 min. I guess the issue is that CA doesn't do 2D as well as it could. It does 3D great, but it would seem to me that 2D tools would be easy to improve, yet they don't seem to worry about it.
The interesting thing is that residential 3d work is 20times harder than commercial - in my opinion. I would take CA any day over Vectorworks for 3D modeling of residential structures. I just wish CA could be more flexible and better for 2D work - as sometimes you need to do concept work before you produce the full model.
I will post a PDF of the drawing file so you guys can print.
-
09-13-2012, 03:18 PM #5
I was under the impression that
rendering=GPU / raytrace=CPUPerry
P.H. DESIGNS L.L.C.
Eastvale Calif.
Alienware, liquid cooled
Ver 10-"X6 x64 SSA
WIN 8.1 PRO 64 bit
Nvidia GTX780 3GB.
i7 920 2.67-- 12 GB Ram
40" led monitor
-
09-13-2012, 03:20 PM #6
Here is an example of a quick 2D site plan early in concept drawing. I used Vectorworks with the "hand-drawn" effect, but overall I wouldn't think CA is suited for doing this simply. Maybe I am wrong and ignorant. I hope I am really.
-
09-13-2012, 03:23 PM #7Joseph P. Carrick, Architect - AIA
ASUS M51AC Desktop, core i7-4770 CPU @3.4 GHZ, 16 GB Ram, NVidea GT640 with60M with 3GB GM, 30" HiRes (2560/1600) Monitor , (2) 24" ASUS Monitors
Windows 8.1
Chief Architect 9, 10, X1, X3, X4 Premium, X5 Premium, X6 Premium
-
09-13-2012, 06:17 PM #8Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Pittsburgh PA.
- Posts
- 85
My old Summagraphic eight pen plotter was sharp, as sharp as the pen.
Greg
X6 Premier Mac
Apple Mac Pro
dual 23" Displays
40" HD TV as Customer Display
since Chief Architect '97
-
09-13-2012, 10:14 PM #9Registered User Promoted
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 66
I disagree, I have always been able to replicate pretty much any presentation style that I've come across and liked. How simply one can do so comes down to how organised and well thought out the process to acheive the final product is.
I think the way Chief utilizes layers, layer sets and custom libraries work perfectly to enable a smooth and productive worklflow with a well setup template from conceptualization stage right through to construction. Ive attached an example which I believe replicates yours which was reasonably fast to produce via creating a layerset with custom linetypes and lineweights, CAD boxes with fills and hatches, revision clouds used to create landscaping items layered up to generate colour and definition and can be added as a library item.
I do however agree that more control in 2D would be beneficial, in the way of custom hatches, ability to have a selected fill and a different backround colour without having to have multiple copies layered with different attributes, graded fills to generate skies or fill windows and an auto area fill tool are some examples.
-
09-13-2012, 03:29 PM #10
Here is a quick color elevation I did for a building (under 1 hr) using Vectorworks and mapping images into the drawing as "fill". I was just trying to show the client a quick idea. It could be that I just don't know CA well enough to "map" images to create drawings like this.
-
09-13-2012, 03:34 PM #11Joseph P. Carrick, Architect - AIA
ASUS M51AC Desktop, core i7-4770 CPU @3.4 GHZ, 16 GB Ram, NVidea GT640 with60M with 3GB GM, 30" HiRes (2560/1600) Monitor , (2) 24" ASUS Monitors
Windows 8.1
Chief Architect 9, 10, X1, X3, X4 Premium, X5 Premium, X6 Premium
-
09-13-2012, 03:42 PM #12
-
09-13-2012, 03:32 PM #13
FYI I can't upload high res files on here. I tried PDF's but no go.
-
09-13-2012, 03:52 PM #14
You should know you can't get off that easy.
Get yourself a free Dropbox account (referral link with extra free space) and let's see that example pdf.Kind Regards,
Dave Pitman
Current Version: X5
System
Win-7 64 bit
Intel i7 930 (2.8 ghz x 4)
Nvidia gtx 260 (1 gb ram)
12 gb ddr3 ram
-
09-13-2012, 05:15 PM #15
I gave it about 25 minutes. Enough to get an idea.
--Kind Regards,
Dave Pitman
Current Version: X5
System
Win-7 64 bit
Intel i7 930 (2.8 ghz x 4)
Nvidia gtx 260 (1 gb ram)
12 gb ddr3 ram