Page 12 of 25 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 432

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    We don't consider the desktop management options of video cards when we make our recommendations. Use of one of these systems is not supported by or tested by us.

    Our recommendations on video cards lean toward Nividia because they have fewer compatibility issues with OpenGL in general than ATI. However, ATI cards are still a good choice so if the use of the supplied desktop management software is an important consideration to you, then that may make ATI a better choice for you.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Cape Cod Mass
    Posts
    724
    Thanks for that, Doug

    Ray C
    X5
    Ray Castano, CAPS, CGP
    Ray@PlansThatWork.com
    God Bless America
    http://www.plansthatwork.com/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    178
    BTW: let me sate my experience was a few months ago with Vista not win7. Drivers change and NVidia's policy may change?? I was surprised to read Ray got Nview working at all with his GTX so who knows what will happen even as soon as tommorrow? So do your homework.

    I didn't even get an acknowledgement that Nvidia even received my emails so who knows?? I might also be able to have another look at Ultramon once I go to win7 as well.
    I dunno if ART, being a software developer, may have a contact that they could get an answer from on Nvidia's position in this matter but I certainly got no joy??
    Regards Rick
    Building Design & Construction Ltd
    Auckland-New Zealand
    09 5357798

    Chief X4-Vista Business

    Core i7 920 2.67GHz o/c to 3.6GHz
    Asus P6T DDR3 1333MHz
    Patriot Viper 6gig DDR3-2000
    2 x GTX275 896mb PCI-e

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    York, Maine
    Posts
    143
    Ray......... I have used dual monitors exclusively for years and nview was a real time saver for window management. On my last hardware upgrade I found that nview was not an option. What I do now and actually prefer to nview is simply open chief on the left monitor, hit shift f6 to put the drawing window in its own window, stretch chief across the right monitor (the drawing window will stay on the left screen). Now you can open any other view in another window and hit shift f6 and the two windows will fill the two monitors. The currently active screen will always fill the left monitor when you shftF6 so you can easily move windows from one screen to the other. Maybe this will help....
    Brian Batson, B.E. Batson Design
    York, Maine
    V3 to X5 - Current Update

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Cape Cod Mass
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Batson View Post
    Ray......... I have used dual monitors exclusively for years and nview was a real time saver for window management. On my last hardware upgrade I found that nview was not an option. What I do now and actually prefer to nview is simply open chief on the left monitor, hit shift f6 to put the drawing window in its own window, stretch chief across the right monitor (the drawing window will stay on the left screen). Now you can open any other view in another window and hit shift f6 and the two windows will fill the two monitors. The currently active screen will always fill the left monitor when you shftF6 so you can easily move windows from one screen to the other. Maybe this will help....
    Thanks for that
    It's just not the same though :-(

    Ray
    X5
    Ray Castano, CAPS, CGP
    Ray@PlansThatWork.com
    God Bless America
    http://www.plansthatwork.com/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4
    I am working on the specs for a new computer for X3. There is very little talk of AMD 1090T 6 core. All that I read on other sites say it is a great gaming cpu and will be better in the future as software takes advantage of the 6 cores. The price is very low, so has anybody considered this?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Ridgway, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by vintage58 View Post
    I am working on the specs for a new computer for X3. There is very little talk of AMD 1090T 6 core. All that I read on other sites say it is a great gaming cpu and will be better in the future as software takes advantage of the 6 cores. The price is very low, so has anybody considered this?
    I must start by saying I am in the same boat, trying to figure out the best bang for the buck in getting a new system. I will say that I have had very good service from my current (old) AMD dual core, which runs X3 OK except for a graphic driver glitch when I zoom in or out in 3D views.

    What I am hearing in this thread is that, while Doug Park said the more cores the better, in addition to how the program uses the additional cores, how the system is set up to utilize those cores will make a difference. This may, however, be more of a factor in notebooks where they are trying to keep the power requirements and excess heat down so they run at a slower speed until the demand is higher. Question is, what triggers the use of additional cores and higher speed? Based on what I have heard here, you want a system where the CPU runs over 2 Ghz at the low end.

    Short version is be careful of systems that have a CPU that run at a range from 1.66 to 2.8 Ghz or you may be stuck running at the lower speed for most things in Chief.

    Perhaps others have more/better information on this issue.
    Larry

    Lawrence C. Kumpost, Architect

    No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be
    stationery.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8
    So, does X3 support 6-core processors or not? I mean does it actually use all 6 of them or just 4? From my limited knowledge of PC, software MUST be designed to utilize a certain number of cores. So X3 either knows how to work with 6-core CPUs or it doesn't, in which case buying Phenom X6 for X3 will be a waste of money. Any official word on it?

    It would be very nice if someone benchmarked various PCs doing the same scene/rendering. Would be interesting to know what to spend money on - good CPU or good videocard.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    LOCKPORT NY
    Posts
    18,655
    I remember seeing posts by someone from CA stating "the more cores the better"

    while Chief may only use X cores you would usually have other software running and the OS itself etc

    might be a good idea to call tech support on Tuesday to discuss

    Lew
    Lew Buttery
    Castle Golden Design - "We make dreams visible"

    Lockport, NY
    716-434-5051
    www.castlegoldendesign.com
    lbuttery at castlegoldendesign.com

    CHIEF X5 (started with v9.5)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    706
    for my two cents worth I would go 4 cores and get a faster speed for similar money.
    Graeme Taylor

    currently loaded X3.1 & X4.2-64 bit & X5 64 bit
    also used v7 to x12
    AMD Phenom 2 black 980 3.7 GHz quad core
    8GB DDR3-1333 RAM
    NVIDIA GEForce GTX560 1024Mb graphics
    win 7 -64 bit
    2 x 24 inch monitors

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    Chief supports 6 and more cores. Some algorithms, such as ray tracing scale well to as many cores as you can buy. Others don't scale as well so as more cores are added some things will speed up better than others.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9
    Tale of Two HP Laptops...

    X3 on Laptop #1 -- Screamin'. Awesome. Makes me dizzy.
    X3 on Laptop #2 -- 1' 45" to launch X3 to get to the Options screen. Freezes for 30" before it even thinks it can look at a 3D perspective.

    CA support said: "ATI Mobility Radeon is a chipset and won't work well with X3." Great...

    I'm confused as I see no such warnings on the forums. I'm about to dump Laptop #2. Any counter arguements saying Laptop#2 should work just fine?
    Thanks, Mark

    LAPTOP#1 -- HP dv7t. Intel i7 quad; 6Gb RAM; NVidea GeForce w/ 1G video ram.

    LAPTOP #2 -- HP dv6z. AMD Phenom quadcore @ 2GHz; 6Gb RAM; ATI Mobility Radeon HD5650 w/ 1G video RAM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    51
    I'm looking at the HP DV7 4080 model which has the i7 with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650. I've read here that someone had an issue with this card on a HP Laptop, but w an AMD processor. So are there Known issues with the ATI cards and X3 or was this just a single strange occurance? Anybody running X3 on this particular Latop model by any chance? Thx for your input.

  14. #14
    marty is offline Registered User Promoted
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Auckland New Zealand
    Posts
    1,310
    I havent had any issues with the ATI card in my laptop and my main system has an ATI 5700 which works well. Both have intel processors though.
    Gordon Martinsen
    Auckland
    New Zealand
    W7 64 bit X5
    i7 2600k 3.7Ghz
    8 GB RAM
    180Gb SSD
    Nvidia GTX 560 1 Gb

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    Launch time depends on a lot of factors as follows:

    1) The program and dlls need to be loaded. The first time they are loaded DLLs are read from disk and cached in memory by the OS. Amount of memory and speed of the disk can make a big difference for this part.

    2) Libraries are loaded. Again on the first launch the OS will cache portions of the library file in memory so it will be faster later. Memory and disk speed are important factors. Size of your library is also important. If on one system the library has much fewer items the time to load will be less.

    3) We try to ping our server to validate your right to use Chief. This normally is very fast, less than a second, but under the right circumstances it can take quite a few seconds for the network connection to time out. A good connection or clear disconnection from the network make this fast.

    4) CPU speed. There is a fair amount of processing that occurs but this is normally a small percentage of the actual launch time which is mostly limited by disk speed.


    I don't have any experience with the recent AMD processors. Just because something has i7 on the cover is also not a guarantee of good performance. There are several flavors of this processor, some of which are targeted to low cost systems.

    The lower power mobile cards usually exhibit much worse performance regardless of vendor so you have to be careful of what you buy.

    Unfortunately, the specs on computers can be very hard to decipher so some research needs to be done before your purchase. When buying a laptop I would tend to look at laptops that are designed as gaming computers. These will generally have the better video cards and faster CPUs and will usually be somewhat more expensive.

    When you get into the lower cost systems a lot more care about what you buy is required so you don't end up with a lemon.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • Login or Register to post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •