Page 11 of 29 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 432
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Comox Valley, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,730
    So when the progress bar dbx pops up and says "building model" it is using CPU? I guess that makes sense. I can rotate and view a very complex model quite smoothly. Maybe I should look into a faster processor?
    Rod Kervin
    Kervin Home Design
    Courtenay BC
    p. 250-871-0316

    If a picture is worth a thousand words, and a video is worth a thousand pictures, then uploading the chief file is worth a thousand videos.

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lubbock
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Park View Post
    You should be fine with that 2.3 GHz quad core. My recommendations for minimum system requirements are any multi-core machine. Although you can run on single core machines as well so the true minimum system depends on what you are doing.

    The video card speed difference is a little surprising because we are doing a lot to save memory on the card which should also speed things up.

    You may also want to uncheck "Use Enhanced Lighting" in the Render preferences to see how that affects performance.

    It may be that the support for shaders on that card is poor leading to slower performance. If that is the case upgrading the video card may make a big difference.

    What kind of card is it?
    Yeah, the quad 2.3 is definitely not the problem. The video card is. It's always been a problem for Chief. It's just a built-in on the MOBO, so it's always needed upgraded. My boss wouldn't have let me do it before since it wasn't necessary... but now I will be able to, but like I said, it's slim pickin's
    Aaron D.

    President
    AMD Drafting, LLC
    Lubbock, Texas
    https://www.facebook.com/amddrafting
    www.vintagetownship.com
    X3

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lubbock
    Posts
    421
    So now that I'm at work I can tell you exactly what I have. NVidia GeForce 6150SE nforce 430/PCI/SSE2, 128 MB, Open GL 2.1.2

    I did what you said, Doug, and turned off enhanced lighting and it works way better now, more like X2 did. It's always been slow to process though especially with final view and the new "art" type renders. Hopefully I can still convince him to let me upgrade. Most good PCI 16x are really cheap these days.
    Aaron D.

    President
    AMD Drafting, LLC
    Lubbock, Texas
    https://www.facebook.com/amddrafting
    www.vintagetownship.com
    X3

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    A very quick search of the internet for the 6150SE and the first place I looked indicated some rather definitive opinions that this integrated graphics chip is very slow. Adding a graphics card to that machine would probably be a pretty inexpensive way of boosting the performance.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Diego California
    Posts
    9,573
    I've heard that dual SLI cards are not all they're cracked up to be, and it is best to just run a high end single card with 1gig. Any suggestions on what I should get, say around the $300 mark?
    Rod, I was on the phone today with the co. that put together my computer and they suggested I go the SLI route.... if ...... ÇA would take advantage of the dual cards .... so that is the info I would like to know..... does CA take advantage of dual graphics cards..... does anybody know the answer to this question?
    D. Scott Hall (The Bridge Troll)
    San Diego, Ca.
    Chief X-5 w/ Win 7
    Asus P6T X58 ATX Core i7
    Intel Core i7 920
    6GB (3X2) DDR3 1600
    NVIDIA GeForce 580 GTX

    The videos we watch are not 100% gold, but if we find a gold nugget, the time spent viewing has a value.

    We can please some of the people some of the time, but we can't please all the people all of the time..... but I will keep trying.

    If you are interested in keeping abreast of any new videos, please subscribe to my channel at YOUTUBE...... channel is ds hall

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    We do nothing special to take advantage of them. That is mostly handled by the drivers which are supposed to split up the work load between the cards. I'm not sure how well this works.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    264
    Doug, I'd sure be interested to know what system setups you use at CA. Might help with researching a new system.
    Viki Wooster, AIBD
    Wooster Design Inspirations
    Bend OR
    Certified Professional Building Designer
    541 420-1230
    Chief X5

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1

    New computers

    I'll add my two bits.
    Just got new Desktop I7, win7 64bit. 8gb ram. Does x2 really fast.
    New Notebook: Elitebook8540w. I7, 64bit, 1 gig video. Is very fast with x2. Not too big but bulletproof, mil spec notebook. PCConnection had a special with the notebook and a dockingstation for 1650.00 or so. If I could do it again I'd spend more on the upgrade for the I7 just to get the faster processing speeds. But this one works just fine.

    For hdmi, dvi, displayport cables you can't beat Monoprice.com They have great customer service too.
    There you have my two cents.
    Lenny Monroe
    Monroe Family Builders LLC
    16322 210th Ave NE
    Woodinville, WA 98077
    425.864.1213

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    264
    Lenny, which i7 processor did you get, and what video card on your desktop? Did you buy a brand name computer, or have it built?
    Viki Wooster, AIBD
    Wooster Design Inspirations
    Bend OR
    Certified Professional Building Designer
    541 420-1230
    Chief X5

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Charlotte NC
    Posts
    21
    Anyone running the AMD's Phenom II X6?

    Although the quad core i7 is faster overall for gaming type applications, wondering if the 6 core has an advantage in Chief? As I understand it, Chief does not support hyperthreading. Anyone have any comments?

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    Both X2 and X3 support multiple cores, which includes hyperthreading. X3 has a lot more support than X2. In particular ray tracing and several other expensive 3D operations will take advantages of as many cores as you can get.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by bendcadgirl View Post
    Doug, I'd sure be interested to know what system setups you use at CA. Might help with researching a new system.
    I second that (i'm buying a new system just for X3 next month)
    With so many opinions going back and forth, a little guidance from cheif as to the best system specs would be helpful (unless they already posted them and I missed it).
    Thanks,
    Charles Uyehara AIA
    Architect & Architectural Photographer
    Design Partners Inc.
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    www.designpartnersinc.com

  13. #163
    thorn is offline Registered User Promoted
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Central CA
    Posts
    210
    My opinion...you will be much better served spending the money for a better single card than two cards using SLI. I spent A LOT of time comparing system running single vs. SLI.
    and concluded there was no advantage to SLI configuration running X2.

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    401

    x2 on i7 720 laptop

    hi guys,
    i read an earlier thread where one of the guys mentioned he had an i7 720. i have just brought one and stuck x2 on it to see how it would go. absolutely sh%thouse!
    i have an "old amd 64 athlonx2 desktop pc" (see specs in my signature) that runs chief like a train and only slows up when i really hit it hard raytracing. the amd desktop is 4 years old and this laptop is brand new. i am incredibly dissapointed with the laptop. i guess i didnt realise that the multicore processors still need to be at a 2 ghz speed to run this program properly. i just figured since it has quad cores it didnt have to run so fast as it would be sharing the load between them. (i havent had much to do with these new quad core processors and the like)

    does anyone know if i can upgrade the chip in the laptop? (i am not familiar with the internals of laptops, gimmie a desktop anyday)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Laptop specs.jpg 
Views:	161 
Size:	126.3 KB 
ID:	41393  

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Diego California
    Posts
    9,573
    absolutely sh%thouse!
    I am not clear.... is this a good thing or a bad thing? I wish you Aussies would learn to speak English.
    D. Scott Hall (The Bridge Troll)
    San Diego, Ca.
    Chief X-5 w/ Win 7
    Asus P6T X58 ATX Core i7
    Intel Core i7 920
    6GB (3X2) DDR3 1600
    NVIDIA GeForce 580 GTX

    The videos we watch are not 100% gold, but if we find a gold nugget, the time spent viewing has a value.

    We can please some of the people some of the time, but we can't please all the people all of the time..... but I will keep trying.

    If you are interested in keeping abreast of any new videos, please subscribe to my channel at YOUTUBE...... channel is ds hall

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • Login or Register to post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •