Cost of E & O insurance

[WendyWelton]

John,

"Never design or build anything for an attorney"

I disagree. Some of my best clients are attorneys. The good ones get the whole risk/reward concept and are are not dying to bring their work home. I interview them as thoroughly as any other. It's almost easier to tell which will be trouble - they "lawyer up" everything right from the start. Both my NH & MA attorneys are also clients.

Adam,

Then you need to just stop worrying. Worry is the art of voluntarily experiencing a trauma that may or may not ever happen. I yell "stop" at myself in my head when I get on the worry train. Be professional, be ethical, educate your clients, then go hug somebody you love.

My little adventure is an entirely avoidable scenario. It's a project from my first year in business, for a client I never should have taken. My small fortune in attorney's fees goes in a category I call "tuition". Expensive, but lesson learned. I respectfully decline all manner of trouble now - "I'm sorry, but I just don't think I can meet your needs... "

Another tip. Re-write your contracts as much in plain english as your attorney can stomach - and go over it with clients paragraph by paragraph. It's called "managing expectations". That paragraph that says we're not responsible for the builder's mistakes? It only does you good if they understand it! I've had so few people try to drag me under the builder's bus since I started doing that, that it's not even funny. Ditto with all the other stuff.

Allen,

What did I win? A pony?

Richard - yes, yes, yes - yelling at the kids, yelling at each other, yelling at the mailman - yelling is not a good sign.

[perryh]

Wendy,
He was wanting a way to protect himself, not a way to draw something he shouldn't be drawing. An "L.L.C. is one way to do that if you cant get any insurance. I,ve had one since they have been invented. That vail can only get pierced only for very punitive actions and must prove malicious intent and very hard to do so. I am lucky to have attorneys as friends and get free advice. most attorneys will look at the case and try to find deep pockets such as "insurance" before they will file any case, but may do so if their client wants to pay for it. Lets just assume everyone here is on the up and up ,and proficient unless otherwise noted. the L.L.C. is a very good way of protecting yourself if there is no insurance.

[lbuttery]

Perry:

I have read/heard that Piercing the veil is easy if you don't conduct regular board meetings and keep minutes etc. IOW, you have to operate like a true business. Family members and friends can serve on the "board".

do some googles on "Piercing the veil" you might be surprised.

Lew

[perryh]

Just The Opposite Is True. L.l.c.'s Are Just A Partnership With Corporate Protection. No Meetings Like The Corps. You Must Have 2 People Min. And Maybe That Has Changed Now, Not Sure About That. I Drew Up My Own Years Ago, Very Simple. My Attorney Says They Must Prove Fraud, And Errors Or Omissions Are Not Fraud. Luckily I Haven't Been Sued Even Though I Have Completed Over 4,000projects And A Ok. A Lot Of Attorneys Around Here Are Using L.l.c.,s For There Own Business's.

[RMorrison]

Just The Opposite Is True. L.l.c.'s Are Just A Partnership With Corporate Protection. No Meetings Like The Corps. You Must Have 2 People Min. And Maybe That Has Changed Now, Not Sure About That. I Drew Up My Own Years Ago, Very Simple. My Attorney Says They Must Prove Fraud, And Errors Or Omissions Are Not Fraud. Luckily I Haven't Been Sued Even Though I Have Completed Over 4,000projects And A Ok. A Lot Of Attorneys Around Here Are Using L.l.c.,s For There Own Business's.

No, they must prove NEGLIGENCE, not fraud. Big difference. And a lot easier to prove.

[lbuttery]

No Meetings Like The Corps

I think you better check on this again ....

Lew

[sutcac]

"And a lot easier to prove."

But still not that easy, in my understanding.

In reading through my recently renewed liability policy declarations, it's strikes me that the first part of those is based on their rights and responsibilities in defending you against a claim. So the first line of defense that you are paying for is not necessarily some easy deep pocket to go after for a judgement against you, but a good lawyer well versed in this area of law. Then on top of that you have a well of money to settle the claim or pay the judgement (usually settled out of court anyway) that will, if you are insured properly, keep your personal assets safe.

Seems to me the LLC approach is dubious as it doesn't provide money for any lawyer, let alone a good one well-versed in the pertinent law that the insurance company is obviously going to have to protect their interests, let alone yours.

I've said it before, the $6000 a year I pay for insurance doesn't go far with a good lawyer, I know this already from one lawsuit that I filed. It's a pretty reasonable cost as far as overhead in a business. The LLC seems far more risky.

Lew- Will you please go to bed? Even Richard out here in CA already signed off!

[RMorrison]

I've said it before, the $6000 a year I pay for insurance doesn't go far with a good lawyer, I know this already from one lawsuit that I filed. It's a pretty reasonable cost as far as overhead in a business. The LLC seems far more risky.

<snip>Even Richard out here in CA already signed off!

No, just took a break

The LLC approach alone is risky, as you say. Although the point has been made here a number of times, it seems that many people don't want to grasp the concept that incorporation in ANY form is NOT going to protect them from a claim of negligence. An LLC may be great to protect your assets from business creditors or employee lawsuits, and may even have tax advantages. But the one thing it will not do is shield you from a lawsuit alleging negligence.