View Poll Results: “Fit to Page” or “Print to Scale”?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • You’re boring us

    3 6.98%
  • I really don’t care

    3 6.98%
  • Leave it like it is!

    4 9.30%
  • Please put it back to “print to scale”

    33 76.74%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,399

    “Fit to Page” or “Print to Scale”

    I hope I am not boring some of you but I have my doubts that ART actually asked users about the “fit to page” decision as a print default. I can think of no benefit to having "fit to page" as a default, except maybe fewer calls to Tech Support on the part of trainees. I may find myself standing corrected. Please weigh in.

    Thanks,

    Sam
    Last edited by spencerdesign; 01-05-2006 at 04:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,697
    IMO the best answer isn't on the list: Make it a user selectable "default". I.e. let the user set it where they want it and have it stay at that setting unless changed by the user.

    Fitch
    X2 <latest>

    You have until you release the drawing to get it right, Mother Nature and the Customer have forever to see if you did. (By me, 1971. )

    For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. Last sentence in the Feynman Appendix to the Challenger Report by R. Feynman

    Never allow those who would substitute intimidation and guilt trips for knowledge and reason to influence your technical judgement. Me, 1993.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Monticello, Fla
    Posts
    51
    Print to scale or user default setting

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sandy Hook, CT
    Posts
    4,203
    The default works! why change it?

    Letting users set the default would not be a problem for experienced users. But a newbie might get tangled here.
    Gary Doski
    3 D Homes Design Services LLC
    Certified Chief Architect X5 Trainer.
    Ver. X5, thru X1
    I train you on your jobs!
    Learn & get your work done at the same time!

    Building Official- CT
    203-270-0646 fax 203-304-2101
    garydoski531@gmail.com
    www.3dhomesdesign.com

    Windows 7 Ultimate-64bit
    i7 975 3.3 GHz 8 cores
    Corsairs 12Gb Ram
    Radeon ATI 9870x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    Ultra 1600 watt PS

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    Posts
    1,697
    Originally posted by Gary Doski
    The default works! why change it?
    If I could set it to "print to scale" and have it stay, I'd not have to set it again. I almost never print "fit to page". So, for me at least, it would be one less chance for a misprint.

    Fitch
    X2 <latest>

    You have until you release the drawing to get it right, Mother Nature and the Customer have forever to see if you did. (By me, 1971. )

    For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. Last sentence in the Feynman Appendix to the Challenger Report by R. Feynman

    Never allow those who would substitute intimidation and guilt trips for knowledge and reason to influence your technical judgement. Me, 1993.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Ridgway, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,917
    When you realize that the default of fit to page can (in many cases) give you a print that is not to scale It seems to me that is the wrong message to send to a new user.

    Having to change that setting each time you print is a real pain. I don't care how it is set "out of the box" but I would like it to hold the setting I use.
    Larry

    Lawrence C. Kumpost, Architect

    No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be
    stationery.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Houston,Texas
    Posts
    10,154
    I think it makes sense to hold the setting as well.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Caro, MI
    Posts
    654
    We should be able to control ALOT more items in Chief, I agree with this thread, we should be in control!!!! Just like all those **** warning dbx's, I want them all shut off!!! I've been using Chief since 1992 ver 2.0. I want more control over roofs and truss' but that will come in time or I will keep cheating and bypassing the system as needed. shane

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    I appreciate the feedback on this.

    The decision we made was based on the following considerations.

    1) Page Setup will normally be set to the printer that you wish to print your final output on and you will select the correct paper and sheet size for your final output. In this case "Fit to Paper" and "Print to Scale" are identical.

    2) It is common to want to print a check plot on smaller paper, likely this will be 8 1/2 x 11 on an alternate printer. In this case "Fit to Paper" is the correct choice.

    3) If you are using a print service or even if you are not, it is common that you will want to print directly to a PDF. This allows the option of having both a portable electronic snapshot form of your plan that you can e-mail, archive, and take to print service. In this case the normal situation is to select a PDF printer driver as your default with the correct paper selected in Page Setup. Printing unscaled check plots and final output would then be done from the PDF viewer.

    4) We also recognized that no matter how well we design the user interface to minimize plotting to an incorrect scale by accident, it will always be possible, and likely probable that this will happen. For example, if you print to a PDF first and then print from the PDF viewer, the PDF viewer can cause rescaling to occur. We added the %scale text macro to aid in verifying that your output, when originally printed from Chief is at the desired scale.

    5) We have limited resources and a requirement to produce a product in a timely manner so that you as customers and we as a business are both successful. This requires that we make some compromises. In this case we weighed the value of rewriting the print dialog vs. making minimal changes to it and focusing the savings in time on other areas. Our decision was that other areas needed more attention.

    6) This dialog is also used in other views, like plan, elevation, cad details, and vector overviews, where "Fit to Paper" is more likely the desired behavior.

    Taking all of these considerations together we came to the conclusion that "Fit to Paper" was a reasonable default. Perhaps our logic is flawed. If so I welcome your feedback.

    In the future we will need to improve the print dialog in many ways. One area is to allow more items in it to have user preferences. Likely these would need to be on a per view type basis. Another important item is to make selection of the paper you wish to print on directly accessible on the print dialog. A print preview in the dialog would also be valuable. The ability to choose to print any set of specific pages is also a frequent request.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    802
    Doug,
    I can see that a lot of thought went into your considerations but unfortuanately - very little actual drafting experience.

    This is because most of us never ever want a print that is not "to scale". I print many many times in the course of a job. Often, this is because due to various limitations of the dimensioning tools in Chief, I must print out to scale in order to find a particular dimension.

    For every plan I do in Chief I must print out dozens of "check prints" that are to scale.

    If I had a nickle for every time I had to click that "to scale" button I could have paid for the entire program by now.

    Of all the things I have to do in Chief to get a set of plans this is the silliest and really demonstrates how little the designers at CA actually understand about the work-a-day world your customers are in.

    The "Fit to page", the stacked windows, and that ****ed Living Area are my votes for the most annoying problems.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Posts
    4,161
    To be clear:

    The only time you need to choose "Print to Scale" to get "to scale" output is when you are either A) printing to paper that is smaller than your selected sheet size or B) printing to paper that is larger than your selected sheet size.

    In case A) you will get multiple sheets with crop marks such that you can cut and tape the sheets together if desired. (I did this once and found it to be a very tedious process with less than ideal results).

    In case B) the output will be centered on the paper.

    Am I missing something more fundamental here?

    Could you clarify what you mean by stacked windows?

    A fix for the living area problem is currently being tested internally.
    Doug Park
    Principal Software Architect
    Chief Architect, Inc.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    4,311
    Thank you Doug. You've made it easier for me, the way I use it. I did not know that which you just explained. However, if you never use "fit to page" and have either case A or case B, you would always want the default set to "print to scale". At least that's what I'm getting from this thread, that most would like to set the default themselves if that's possible. But, that may not work because of the Page Setup?
    Last edited by ambrozac; 01-08-2006 at 02:19 PM.
    Cliff
    X6

    Vista Home Premium SP-2
    Gateway FX6800-01e
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz
    7.00 GB RAM DDR 3........64-bit OS
    NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250/PCIe/SSE2 1024 MB Memory

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Portsmouth, NH; boston area
    Posts
    10,647
    I would prefer that Print to Scale be the default. If somebody misses changing the setting, the results of the error are less serious - perhaps some wasted paper, as opposed to publishing drawings that a contractor, against all warnings, will scale...

    W

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ulladulla NSW Australia
    Posts
    40
    Print to scale is the go for a default. If you have a single tray CAD printer like me ( Canon i9950 ) loaded with A3 then check plots or perspective views are nearly always sent to the A4 laser which is chosen from the printer list.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    MEDFORD, OR
    Posts
    34
    Print to scale is by far the better choice as a default until the print window is up for re-design in the future.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • Login or Register to post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •