Results 1 to 15 of 57

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    6,414
    Originally posted by James Eggert
    A simple enough question here is "Why did ART set dimensioning this way?". For what psuedo reasoning?

    ??????????????????????/
    here's my guess... this is left over from when systems had much more limited resources than they do now...dropping the extra numbers and b-slash saved a bit of space...remember programs used to run off those 5 1/2" floppies

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • Login or Register to post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •